Skip to main content
What Are You Looking For?

Welcome to the KH Law Wiki Search for answers using the search box below,
or our ChatGPT AI Bot in the lower right.

Popular searches: Mediators, Experts, Temp Relief

< All Topics

Discovery – Request for Admissions / RFA

Request for Admissions are used more often in non-family civil cases, but they can be used in Family Law cases as part of discovery.  You generally do two types of admissions

  1. ask to admit the genuiness of a document
  2. ask to admit statements.

The short version of what a Request for Admission is that you serve a list of specific questions to the other lawyer and if they don’t deny them within 30 days then they are “deemed admitted” which means that at trial the other party can’t change their mind or answer.

The main reason they are used is to get direct answers to very specific questions or in hopes that the other party won’t respond or won’t respond in time then everything will be deemed admitted.

(examples at bottom)

Statute on Request for Admissions

Minn Rule of Civil Procedure – Rule 36.Requests for Admission

36.01Request for Admission

A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26.02 set forth in the request that relate to statements, opinions of fact, or the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents shall be served with the request, unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served after service of the summons and complaint.

Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless within 30 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by the party’s attorney; but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 45 days after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and, when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, the party shall specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless the party states that a reasonable inquiry has been made and that the information known or readily obtainable by the party is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; the party may, subject to the provisions of Rule 37.03, deny the matter or set forth reasons why the party cannot admit or deny it.

The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request is to be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of Rule 37.01(d) apply to the award of expenses incurred in connection with the motion.

36.02Effect of Admission

Any matter admitted pursuant to this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to Rule 16 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice that party in maintaining the action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party hereunder is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission by that party for any other purpose nor may it be used against that party in any other proceeding.

 

Here are some sample admissions (both ours and other attorneys)

Request For Admissions

2023-02-20 Request for Admissions

2020-07-28 SB’s Request for Admissions

2021-05-24 Our Response to Admissions – EFILED

2021-01-19 DRAFT bf – Request for Admissions

2020-05-13 DAS Draft Request For Admissions